Search This Blog
Followers
Blog Archive
About Me
- Michael
- Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Speeding is catching up to Drivers
One important statistic that could help raise awareness is that speeding does not actually save a noticeable amount of time. If we take a trip that is 20 miles long, when travelling at 60MPH it takes 20 minutes to reach your destination. Now when you increase the speed to 70MPH, in the same distance, you only arrive around 3 minutes sooner. Now this is without traffic or lights. If you take into account those factors, you may only be saving yourself a minute or two. Is that really worth the risk of a fine and demerits? Or that you are endangering yourself, anyone who might be in the car and the other innocent people on the road? Plus, if you are pulled over, you will end up losing those minutes you so recklessly managed to obtain by speeding.
Close to 80 drivers were caught exceeding the limits with speeds upwards of 50km/h! That means on the Yellowhead they would have been going at least 120km/h, on 170th it would have been around 110km/h, and on the outskirts of the Henday their speeds would have reached 160km/h! Now anyone of those speeds is enough to take a life. The data we have on the toll speeding takes on human life is also shocking. Forty percent of drivers killed in crashes where speed was a factor were aged 16 to 24. Speeding is increasing in people aged 45 or older than it is in those 45 and younger. Eighty percent of individuals killed in speed related collisions were speeding as well. All of this information is very troubling, seeing as the main demographic of people being killed in car crashes are my age. These could be my friends, or siblings.
Speeding decreases your reaction time, and increases the chance of serious injury or fatality to those involved. Until we have learned the devastating effect that this simple action has on our society we won’t be able to correct it. You can always pay back a fine, but you can never pay back a life you ended.
Links:
http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/roadsafety/tp-tp2436-rs200807-menu-158.htm
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/life/Police+Edmonton+area+speeders+hours/2469469/story.html
http://www.edmontonsun.com/news/edmonton/2010/03/31/13430846.html
http://www.modot.org/northeast/SpeedChart.htm
Look at the stats!
Murky Mukherjee
The ending of The Tenant leaves room for much discussion. What Ashoke Mehta's last words to her mean? What he meant by having to take care of his vices? All of this is debatable since Mukherjee leaves the reader with only scraps for what will happen with Maya.
To start, Ashoke claims he had to take care of some "vices". Now these vices could be anything. But looking back to their first conversation, Ashoke states he is a man of temptation, and some temptations he does not try to resist, combined with him taking out an ad to meet people solely for sex. I interpreted this combination as Ashoke being a sex addict as well. With the vices he had to take care of were a few more flings before contacting Maya again. When he tells Maya that she has a problem too, it seems like she told him that she was addicted to sex too, which is why she will come back to him. Mukherjee even slightly foreshadows a marriage between them when Maya states that, "He knows how to come across to a stranger who may end up a spouse." So since Ashoke has satisfied his vices, it seems he is ready to settle down with Maya and get married.
It's really hard to overlook the cultural implications attached to the ending as well. Maya is constantly attempting to evade the fame that her family has back home in India. That seemed to be the motivation for her not desiring a relationship with an Indian man. When she finally met Ashoke, her whole view point seemed to change instantly. For me, this symbolized that no matter how hard you try, you will have to embrace your roots one way or another. I am not implying that the only way for Maya to embrace her roots is to marry an Indian man, but it seems like the most logical choice for a character such as Maya.
Overall, this ending is extremely debatable and from what I read and noticed this is what I believed Bharati Mukherjee meant. With both Ashoke and Maya being sex addicts it makes some sense that they would end up being a couple. Along with the cultural implications, this point of view on the ending makes sense.
Small Murders
This poem is by Aimee Nezhukumatathil. What first attracted me to it was the title. It left me curious about what the poem would be about. The entire poem focuses on the sense of smell and how it can affect the relationship between two people. It centers around a girl on a date with a new boy, but still in the grips of her former relationship. It really brings out the physical part of a change in a relationship. The author truly brings out the minds senses throughout the poem with her terrific descriptions of every smell she wants the reader to imagine. Each time I read it my mind kept trying to process all the different angles of imagery that Nezhukumatathil is able to portray. She also includes some famous relationships from the bowels of history, like Napolena and Josephine and Cleopatra and Antony. This really managed to pull me into the world that Nezhukumatathil was creating. "Your mark on me washed away with each kiss," perfectly expressed how anyone feels after leaving a heavy relationship. At the end, the girl finally shows her guilt of leaving her former lover. This part somewhat confused me, since she had been so enamoured with original boy. You would think she would feel as though she was "murdering" her former lovers hold on her. Everyone should read this since many people can relate to this situation, and because of the beautiful imagination used by Nezhukumatathil throughout the poem!
Dollars for Gold!
The Olympics only come around every two years (Summer & Winter), and to have them come to your home country is the chance of a lifetime for all of these athletes competing. The "Own the podium" campaign was started when it was first announced that Vancouver would host the 2010 winter games. This program has been taking some heat for being too competitive, and un-Canadian like. Many people believe that it is strictly focusing on the medal count, when really it was a program started to help financially aid Canadian athletes so that they could be at the top of their game to represent their flag when the games rolled around. And yes, a result of this program would be more medals, but of course we want to do well at our own games. If you were to host a party, wouldn't you want to be nicely dressed? The Canadian government wanted to provide these athletes with the experience of a lifetime. It is quite an accomplishment to say you are an Olympian, but to say you won an Olympic medal puts you in a whole other category. We just wanted our athletes to have the best shot at winning in their sport.