Search This Blog

Followers

About Me

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Friday, March 26, 2010

PostHeaderIcon Look at the stats!


              The upcoming cuts to the University of Alberta funding and increases in overall tution will leave many people wincing when the dust settles.  To start, the professional degree programs are looking at upwards of 66% increases in tution.  That averages out roughly to $4,000 extra for students looking to enroll in medicine, on top of the tution they are already paying!  This could force many students to have to withdraw from their programs without even recieving the degree they have worked so hard for.  This situation also applies to the staff, as the U of A is hoping some it’s staff will take voluntary retirment packages, and take unpaid days off.   But that won’t cover the entire deficit either, so layoffs are in the near future.  Some faculty positions won’t be filled either, which will likely result in seats in certain classes becoming very valued since some classes may be offered less due to lack of staff. 
All of this seems to be leaning towards the thinking that education is a privilage not a right.  Students may be forced to work full time throughout the whole year just be able to pay for the tutions and the cost of living.  It should never come to the point where what class you are in will decide if you are eligible for post secondary education.  There are other, less expensive choices of schools throughout Alberta, but individuals looking to get a degree in a professional  field must know be able to provide the institution with an obscene amount of money.  As I am looking to continue on into business, these increase will affect me and my family.  But once my emotions subsided and i started thinking about this situation.  The price increases seem discriminatory towards the professional programs but on avergae, students graduating with a degree in medicine, business, or dentistry will likely make more than someone with an arts degree.  But this would increase would have to come with a special form of student loan, which I saw mentioned in the recent SU elections.  The idea was for a student loan repayment program that was based upon how much money you were making after you received your degree and had a job.  You would be paying in accordance to how much you were making at your new job.  I think this could alleviate some of the pressure that is being felt by students who will have troubles paying their loans back.

I went and did some comparing to other Universities in Canada and around the world to see how we rank in tuition.  Bear in mind that I was only able to obtain the data from these schools for the 2009 fiscal year, so I have no idea if they will be looking at increase too.  McGill, the number one rated Canadian university has a student population of 34,000.  That is only 3000 less than the U of A!  Comparing our 2009 tuition to McGill’s 2009 tuition showed that we were paying, for a domestic student, on average $USD 700 more than McGill!  That is 16% more than a school ranked number one in Canada and 18th worldwide!  The U of A on the other hand is ranked 59th.  Now it is possible that the cost of tuition for a domestic student there is pulled down by a higher population (43% higher) of international students.  But tuition for international students is only $100 higher (not including living costs, ect.) at McGill.  Graduate student statistics are nearly equal in population (domestic and international) and in tuition.  So with looking at this data, McGill must either receive better provincial funding than our fine government has managed to supply us with, or they operate much more efficiently than the U of A.  I will leave you with one final stat for you to look over; although these numbers are from 2007, they will still be relevant today.  The highest paid university president in the country was our own Indira Samarasekera with a whopping $591,000 salary!  The next closest is the president of McMaster at $504,790.  All the while the president of McGill is nowhere to be found in the top 5.  Needless to say, that would pay for a couple of students wishing to become doctors!

If you wish to see the sites I collected my data from here are the links:
http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=5833c557-8279-4849-8d92-166db62a8087



Monday, March 15, 2010

PostHeaderIcon Murky Mukherjee

    The ending of The Tenant leaves room for much discussion. What Ashoke Mehta's last words to her mean? What he meant by having to take care of his vices? All of this is debatable since Mukherjee leaves the reader with only scraps for what will happen with Maya.


 

    To start, Ashoke claims he had to take care of some "vices". Now these vices could be anything. But looking back to their first conversation, Ashoke states he is a man of temptation, and some temptations he does not try to resist, combined with him taking out an ad to meet people solely for sex. I interpreted this combination as Ashoke being a sex addict as well. With the vices he had to take care of were a few more flings before contacting Maya again. When he tells Maya that she has a problem too, it seems like she told him that she was addicted to sex too, which is why she will come back to him. Mukherjee even slightly foreshadows a marriage between them when Maya states that, "He knows how to come across to a stranger who may end up a spouse." So since Ashoke has satisfied his vices, it seems he is ready to settle down with Maya and get married.


 

    It's really hard to overlook the cultural implications attached to the ending as well. Maya is constantly attempting to evade the fame that her family has back home in India. That seemed to be the motivation for her not desiring a relationship with an Indian man. When she finally met Ashoke, her whole view point seemed to change instantly. For me, this symbolized that no matter how hard you try, you will have to embrace your roots one way or another. I am not implying that the only way for Maya to embrace her roots is to marry an Indian man, but it seems like the most logical choice for a character such as Maya.


 

Overall, this ending is extremely debatable and from what I read and noticed this is what I believed Bharati Mukherjee meant. With both Ashoke and Maya being sex addicts it makes some sense that they would end up being a couple. Along with the cultural implications, this point of view on the ending makes sense.

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

PostHeaderIcon Small Murders


    This poem is by Aimee Nezhukumatathil. What first attracted me to it was the title. It left me curious about what the poem would be about. The entire poem focuses on the sense of smell and how it can affect the relationship between two people. It centers around a girl on a date with a new boy, but still in the grips of her former relationship. It really brings out the physical part of a change in a relationship. The author truly brings out the minds senses throughout the poem with her terrific descriptions of every smell she wants the reader to imagine. Each time I read it my mind kept trying to process all the different angles of imagery that Nezhukumatathil is able to portray. She also includes some famous relationships from the bowels of history, like Napolena and Josephine and Cleopatra and Antony. This really managed to pull me into the world that Nezhukumatathil was creating. "Your mark on me washed away with each kiss," perfectly expressed how anyone feels after leaving a heavy relationship. At the end, the girl finally shows her guilt of leaving her former lover. This part somewhat confused me, since she had been so enamoured with original boy. You would think she would feel as though she was "murdering" her former lovers hold on her. Everyone should read this since many people can relate to this situation, and because of the beautiful imagination used by Nezhukumatathil throughout the poem!